FundingPips Review
Independent analysis of FundingPips's challenge structure, payout speed, and trader outcomes. Not yet rated by PropDNA traders — be the first to review it.
Last verified: October 26, 2026 · PropDNA editorial team
Low sample: 0 reviews. The score settles as more members review this firm.
Our take on FundingPips
- ✓80% profit split — competitive
- ✓On-demand payouts — request a withdrawal any time you qualify
- ✗Challenge fee is not refunded — factor this into your cost
- ✓Stable ruleset — no documented rule changes
- ✓News trading permitted — no blackout windows during economic releases
PropDNA only scores a firm once real traders have reviewed it — reviews are the biggest factor in the trust score.FundingPips hasn't been reviewed yet. The firm's rules, payout terms and other facts are below.
How we score →How PropDNA calculates Trust Score
PropDNA Trust Score is a 0–100 composite score measuring how reliable and trader-friendly a prop firm is. It is calculated from seven independently verified components — no single firm can inflate it artificially.
- 25ptTrader RatingBayesian-weighted star average from verified reviews, weighted by payout proof and membership status
- 22ptPayout AccessDays until a payout can be requested: ≤4 days (or on demand) earns full marks; >21 days earns minimum
- 18ptRules Quality IndexAdmin-scored index of how trader-friendly the firm's ruleset is (−50 predatory to +50 generous)
- 15ptReview VolumeLogarithmic scale — more reviews raise the score, but flooding with reviews has diminishing returns
- 10ptPropDNA VerifiedManual badge awarded after independent verification by the PropDNA editorial team
- 10ptRule StabilityDeducts 3 pts per documented rule change — firms that change rules unpredictably score lower
- 5ptVerified BuyersAdditive bonus from PropDNA members who submitted verified proof of challenge purchase
Trading rules
Advantages
- +On-demand payouts (0 days) beat the listed firms average of 9.6 days significantly.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the listed firms average of $69.40.
- +Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the listed firms average of 7.9%, giving traders more room.
- +Three platform options (MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader) offer solid multi-platform flexibility.
Watch out for
- −Profit split of 80% is below the listed firms average of 83.2%.
- −Max funding of $100,000 is well below the listed firms average of $310,294.10.
- −Two evaluation steps required, above the listed firms average of 1.6 steps.
TRADER REVIEWS
+ Write a review — up to 100 PPPAYOUT CALCULATOR — 80% SPLIT
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS — FUNDINGPIPS
COMPARE FUNDINGPIPS WITH
We earn a commission if you start a challenge through our links — this keeps PropDNA free. It never affects the order. Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Commissions never affect rankings or Trust Scores, which follow our published methodology.Privacy Policy
Risk warning: Proprietary trading challenges involve real financial risk. The majority of challenge participants do not pass and lose their entry fee. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This page is for informational and comparison purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Always read the firm's full terms and conditions before committing any funds. Full risk warning →