PropDNA
Compare/FundingPips vs FTMO

FundingPips vs FTMO

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC
FPIP
FundingPips
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
TRUST SCORE—65/100
PROFIT SPLIT80%TIE80%TIE
PAYOUT DAYSOn demandBETTER14d
MIN COST$32BETTER$99
MAX FUNDING$100,000$200,000BETTER
RATING—4.5/5
REVIEW COUNT02BETTER
STEPS2-step2-step
DRAWDOWNStatic/Balance-basedFixed

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Metals, Energies, Indices, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader

FTMO DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

FundingPips PROS

  • +On-demand payouts (0 days) beat the listed firms average of 9.6 days significantly.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the listed firms average of $69.40.
  • +Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the listed firms average of 7.9%, giving traders more room.
  • +Three platform options (MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader) offer solid multi-platform flexibility.

FundingPips CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the listed firms average of 83.2%.
  • −Max funding of $100,000 is well below the listed firms average of $310,294.10.
  • −Two evaluation steps required, above the listed firms average of 1.6 steps.

FTMO PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
  • +Fee refund is available
  • +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
  • +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
  • +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.

FTMO CONS

  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
  • −News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FundingPips
Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts (On demand). 80% profit split.
FTMO
Trust score 65/100. Slower payouts (14d). 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FundingPips Full Review →FTMO Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA
Risk

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Commissions never affect rankings or Trust Scores, which follow our published methodology.Privacy Policy