RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

WeGetFunded vs FundingPips

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

WGFD

WeGetFunded

FPIP

FundingPips

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022

WEGETFUNDED

METRIC

FUNDINGPIPS

47/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER78/100

3.42/5BETTER

RATING

—0/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$2,000,000

$199—

MIN COST

BETTER$29

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

5BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—0

WEGETFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
MARKETS: Forex, Crypto, Commodities, Indices
PLATFORMS: cTrader, MT5

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

WeGetFunded PROS

+Overall drawdown of 4% is significantly lower than the industry average of 7.9%, limiting downside risk.
+Offers two well-regarded platforms, cTrader and MT5, giving traders flexible execution options.
+Covers four asset classes including Forex, Crypto, Commodities, and Indices for diversified trading.
+Min challenge cost of $199 is close to the industry average of $186.7, making entry reasonably accessible.

WeGetFunded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their gains.
−Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Two steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more hoops to reach a live account.

FundingPips PROS

+Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

FundingPips CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
−Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
−No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

PROPDNA VERDICT

WeGetFunded

Lower trust score (47/100). Slower payouts at —d. 80% profit split.

START WITH WGFD