RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

TribeFunded vs FundingPips

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TRIBE

TribeFunded

FPIP

FundingPips

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022

TRIBEFUNDED

METRIC

FUNDINGPIPS

42/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER78/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—80%

$1,500,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$2,000,000

$20BETTER

MIN COST

—$29

1dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—2d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

TRIBEFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

TribeFunded PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring traders significantly.
+Max funding of $1,500,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Min challenge cost of $20 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very accessible.

TribeFunded CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
−Steps to funded is 1, which is positive, but no platform or trading condition details are provided, limiting transparency.
−No information on weekend holding, news trading, EA use, or fee refund policy reduces comparability.

FundingPips PROS

+Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

FundingPips CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
−Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
−No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

PROPDNA VERDICT

TribeFunded

Lower trust score (42/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.

START WITH TRIBE