RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Take Profit Trader vs FundingPips

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TPTP

Take Profit Trader

EST. 2022

FPIP

FundingPips

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022

TAKE PROFIT TRADER

METRIC

FUNDINGPIPS

48/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER78/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$150,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$2,000,000

$50—

MIN COST

BETTER$29

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER2d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

TAKE PROFIT TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic
TYPES: futures, beginner

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

Take Profit Trader PROS

+Min challenge cost of $50 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7
+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
+News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass

Take Profit Trader CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
−Max funding of $150,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7

FundingPips PROS

+Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

FundingPips CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
−Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
−No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Take Profit Trader

Lower trust score (48/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH TPTP