RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
The Breakout Edge vs FundingPips
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
TBOE
The Breakout Edge
FPIP
FundingPips
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
THE BREAKOUT EDGE
METRIC
FUNDINGPIPS
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER78/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$2,000,000
—
MIN COST
$29
—
PAYOUT DAYS
2d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
THE BREAKOUT EDGE DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker
The Breakout Edge PROS
- +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for this firm
- +No fee, payout, or structure data provided to evaluate competitiveness
- +No platform or market information is available to assess trading flexibility
- +No founding date or country data is available to assess firm history or jurisdiction
The Breakout Edge CONS
- −No data is provided for this firm, making any meaningful comparison impossible
- −Traders cannot assess profit split, funding, or costs against industry averages
- −Complete absence of data is a significant transparency concern for traders making financial decisions
FundingPips PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.
FundingPips CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
- −No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy