RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Nordic Funder vs FundingPips

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

NFND

Nordic Funder

EST. 2022

FPIP

FundingPips

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022

NORDIC FUNDER

METRIC

FUNDINGPIPS

69/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER78/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$2,000,000

$59—

MIN COST

BETTER$29

7d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER2d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

NORDIC FUNDER DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: forex

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

Nordic Funder PROS

+Min challenge cost of $59 is well below the industry average of $186.7
+On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly alternatives
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, maximising trading flexibility
+Both MT4 and MT5 are supported, covering the most widely used retail trading platforms

Nordic Funder CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
−Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer

FundingPips PROS

+Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

FundingPips CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
−Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
−No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Nordic Funder

Lower trust score (69/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.

START WITH NFND