RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ICFunded vs FundingPips

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ICFD

ICFunded

FPIP

FundingPips

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022

ICFUNDED

METRIC

FUNDINGPIPS

50/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER78/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$500,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$2,000,000

$74—

MIN COST

BETTER$29

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER2d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

ICFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: static
MARKETS: forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
PLATFORMS: mt5
TYPES: forex, futures

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

ICFunded PROS

+Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
+Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
+Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
+Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.

ICFunded CONS

−Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
−Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
−Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.

FundingPips PROS

+Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

FundingPips CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
−Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
−No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ICFunded

Lower trust score (50/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH ICFD