RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Funded Trading Plus vs FundingPips
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FTTP
Funded Trading Plus
EST. 2021
FPIP
FundingPips
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
FUNDED TRADING PLUS
METRIC
FUNDINGPIPS
60/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER78/100
3.5/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$100,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$1,759—
MIN COST
BETTER$29
3d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER2d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
FUNDED TRADING PLUS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Crypto, Energy, Indices, Metals, Other Commodities, FX
- PLATFORMS
- cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, MT5
FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker
Funded Trading Plus PROS
- +On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted
- +Four platforms supported (cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, MT5) offering broad trader choice
- +Wide market access including Crypto, Energy, Indices, Metals, Commodities, and FX
Funded Trading Plus CONS
- −Min challenge cost of $1,759 is dramatically above the industry average of $186.7
- −Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
FundingPips PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.
FundingPips CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
- −No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.
PROPDNA VERDICT
Funded Trading Plus
Lower trust score (60/100). Slower payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy