PropDNA
⌘K
Compare/FTMO vs FundingPips
HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026

FTMO vs FundingPips

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
FPIP
FundingPips
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
TRUST SCORE69/100
PROFIT SPLIT80%TIE80%TIE
PAYOUT DAYS14d2dBETTER
MIN COST$99$32BETTER
MAX FUNDING$200,000TIE$200,000TIE
RATING4.45/5
REVIEW COUNT4BETTER0
STEPS2-step2-step
DRAWDOWNFixedStatic/Balance-based

FTMO DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Metals, Energies, Indices, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader

FTMO PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
  • +Fee refund is available
  • +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
  • +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
  • +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.

FTMO CONS

  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
  • News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.

FundingPips PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

FundingPips CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
  • No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FTMO
Trust score 69/100. Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
FundingPips
Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FTMO Full Review →FundingPips Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA
RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy