FundingPips vs ZoraFX

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

+Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
−Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
−No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a significantly higher earnings share.
+Min challenge cost of $59 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
+Fee refund is offered, reducing the effective cost of the challenge upon successful completion.
+Weekend holding and news trading are both permitted, providing strong flexibility for trading strategies.

−Overall drawdown of 5% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less margin for drawdown before breach.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
−Days to first payout at 10 is above the industry average of 6.5, meaning a longer wait for initial earnings.

FundingPips

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.

ZoraFX

Trust score 50/100. Slower payouts at 10d. 90% profit split.