HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026
FundingPips vs The Trading Pit
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | FundingPips ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022 | The Trading Pit EST. 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | — | — |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 80%TIE | 80%TIE |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 0dBETTER | 14d |
| MIN COST | $32 | $29BETTER |
| MAX FUNDING | $100,000 | $200,000BETTER |
| RATING | — | — |
| REVIEW COUNT | 0TIE | 0TIE |
| STEPS | 2-step | 1-step |
| DRAWDOWN | Static/Balance-based | Trailing |
FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Metals, Energies, Indices, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader
THE TRADING PIT DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Metals, Indices, Energies, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Quantower, ATAS, Rithmic, Sierra Chart, cTrader
FundingPips PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.
FundingPips CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
- −No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.
The Trading Pit PROS
- +Max funding of $5,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7
- +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
- +Broadest market access listed, covering Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, and Futures
The Trading Pit CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
- −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps
PROPDNA VERDICT
The Trading Pit
Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy