RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FundingPips vs Goat Funded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FPIP
FundingPips
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
GOAT
Goat Funded
EST. 2023
FUNDINGPIPS
METRIC
GOAT FUNDED
78/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—63/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$2,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$400,000
$29BETTER
MIN COST
—$49
2dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE2d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker
GOAT FUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- TradeLocker, MT5
FundingPips PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.
FundingPips CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
- −No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.
Goat Funded PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Fee refund is offered, reducing financial risk for traders who pass the challenge.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.
Goat Funded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Max funding of $400,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, though it also provides more buffer.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy