RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FundingPips vs Glow Node
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FPIP
FundingPips
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
GLWN
Glow Node
FUNDINGPIPS
METRIC
GLOW NODE
78/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—60/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER3.5/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$2,000,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$29
MIN COST
—
2d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker
GLOW NODE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
FundingPips PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.
FundingPips CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
- −No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.
Glow Node PROS
- +Based in the United Kingdom, a well-regulated financial jurisdiction offering trader protections
- +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
- +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
- +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
Glow Node CONS
- −Steps to funded is 2, matching the industry average of 1.6 but not below it
- −No profit split, funding cap, or payout data is available for comparison
- −Limited data makes it impossible to fully evaluate this firm against industry benchmarks
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy