RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FundingPips vs Get Funded Now
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FPIP
FundingPips
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
GFND
Get Funded Now
FUNDINGPIPS
METRIC
GET FUNDED NOW
78/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$2,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$29BETTER
MIN COST
—$123
2d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker
GET FUNDED NOW DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities
FundingPips PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.
FundingPips CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
- −No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.
Get Funded Now PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Single-step evaluation is below the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded
- +On-demand payouts provide maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
Get Funded Now CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering less buffer
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass
- −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy