FundingPips vs FundedFirm

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

+Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
−Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
−No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

+100% profit split is exceptionally above the industry average of 84.7%
+Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Single-step evaluation is below the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded
+Fee refund is available, reducing the net cost of the evaluation

−Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
−Min challenge cost of $549 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass

FundingPips

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Slower payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.

FundedFirm

Trust score 64/100. Faster payouts at 1d. 100% profit split.