RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FundingPips vs City Traders Imperium

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FundingPips
FPIP
FundingPips
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
City Traders Imperium
CTIM
City Traders Imperium
EST. 2018
FUNDINGPIPS
METRIC
CITY TRADERS IMPERIUM
78/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
58/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER3/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$2,000,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$4,000,000
$29BETTER
MIN COST
$129
2d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
PASS RATE
25%
0
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

CITY TRADERS IMPERIUM DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, advanced, large-cap

FundingPips PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

FundingPips CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
  • No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

City Traders Imperium PROS

  • +Max funding of $4,000,000 is vastly above the industry average of $839,272.7
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Founded in 2018, making it one of the more established firms in the industry
  • +On-demand payouts provide immediate access to profits

City Traders Imperium CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation

PROPDNA VERDICT

FundingPips
Higher trust score (78/100). Slower payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.
City Traders Imperium
Lower trust score (58/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FundingPips Full Review →City Traders Imperium Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy