RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FundingPips vs Crypto Fund Trader

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FundingPips
FPIP
FundingPips
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
CRFT
Crypto Fund Trader
EST. 2022
FUNDINGPIPS
METRIC
CRYPTO FUND TRADER
78/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$2,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$29BETTER
MIN COST
—$5,000
2d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

CRYPTO FUND TRADER DETAILS

STEPS
-phase
MARKETS
Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5

FundingPips PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

FundingPips CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
  • −Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
  • −No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

Crypto Fund Trader PROS

  • +Crypto-focused offering provides niche market access unavailable at most prop firms
  • +Based in Switzerland, a well-regulated and reputable financial hub
  • +Founded in 2022, indicating an established operational track record
  • +Offers MT5, a widely used and trusted trading platform

Crypto Fund Trader CONS

  • −Min challenge cost of $5,000 is vastly higher than the industry average of $186.7
  • −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
  • −No profit split, drawdown, or profit target data provided, limiting informed comparison

PROPDNA VERDICT

FundingPips
Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.
Crypto Fund Trader
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

FundingPips Full Review →Crypto Fund Trader Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy