RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Futures Family vs FundingPips

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FFAM

Funded Futures Family

FPIP

FundingPips

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022

FUNDED FUTURES FAMILY

METRIC

FUNDINGPIPS

0/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER78/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

80%

—

MAX FUNDING

$2,000,000

—

MIN COST

$29

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

FUNDED FUTURES FAMILY DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

Funded Futures Family PROS

+US-based firm operating in a well-known financial jurisdiction.
+No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
+No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
+No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.

Funded Futures Family CONS

−Almost no operational data is available for Funded Futures Family, making meaningful comparison impossible.
−Note: as a futures firm, drawdown is likely expressed in dollar terms and cannot be compared to the 7.9% CFD average.
−Traders cannot evaluate profit potential or risk parameters without any disclosed key metrics.

FundingPips PROS

+Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

FundingPips CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
−Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
−No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Futures Family

Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH FFAM