Funderpro vs FundingPips
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | Funderpro EST. 2023 | FundingPips ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | — | — |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 80%TIE | 80%TIE |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 14d | On demandBETTER |
| MIN COST | $69 | $32BETTER |
| MAX FUNDING | $200,000BETTER | $100,000 |
| RATING | — | — |
| REVIEW COUNT | 0TIE | 0TIE |
| STEPS | 2-step | 2-step |
| DRAWDOWN | Static/Balance-based | Static/Balance-based |
FUNDERPRO DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Metals, Oil, Indices, Crypto, Stocks
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker
FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Metals, Energies, Indices, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader
Funderpro PROS
- +Overall drawdown allowance is 10%, above the 7.9% average across listed firms, giving traders more room.
- +Min challenge cost of $69 is below the $69.4 average across listed firms, making entry slightly cheaper.
- +Three platforms available (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker), offering traders meaningful choice across listed firms.
- +Six markets available including Forex, Metals, Oil, Indices, Crypto, and Stocks, providing broad diversification.
Funderpro CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the 83.2% average across listed firms, meaning traders keep less.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is below the $310,294.1 average across listed firms, limiting scaling potential.
- −Payout window of 14 days is longer than the 9.6-day average across listed firms, delaying access to profits.
FundingPips PROS
- +On-demand payouts (0 days) beat the listed firms average of 9.6 days significantly.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the listed firms average of $69.40.
- +Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the listed firms average of 7.9%, giving traders more room.
- +Three platform options (MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader) offer solid multi-platform flexibility.
FundingPips CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the listed firms average of 83.2%.
- −Max funding of $100,000 is well below the listed firms average of $310,294.10.
- −Two evaluation steps required, above the listed firms average of 1.6 steps.
PROPDNA VERDICT
FundingPips
Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts (On demand). 80% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Risk
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Commissions never affect rankings or Trust Scores, which follow our published methodology.Privacy Policy