HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026
E8 Markets vs FundingPips
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | E8 Markets EST. 2021 | FundingPips ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | 67/100 | — |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 80%TIE | 80%TIE |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 3d | 2dBETTER |
| MIN COST | $58 | $29BETTER |
| MAX FUNDING | $1,000,000 | $2,000,000BETTER |
| RATING | 4.73/5 | — |
| REVIEW COUNT | 4BETTER | 0 |
| STEPS | 2-step | 2-step |
| DRAWDOWN | Trailing EOD | Fixed |
E8 MARKETS DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker
FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker
E8 Markets PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $58 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry barriers.
- +Max funding of $1,000,000 exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
- +Days to first payout of 3 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Wide platform selection including MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, and TradeLocker suits diverse trader preferences.
E8 Markets CONS
- −Profit split of 80% falls below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing trader earnings.
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing and position traders.
- −Steps to funded is 2, above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages.
FundingPips PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.
FundingPips CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
- −No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy
