PropDNA
Search firms, traders…⌘K
Compare/E8 Markets vs FundingPips
HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026

E8 Markets vs FundingPips

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC
E8MK
E8 Markets
EST. 2021
FPIP
FundingPips
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
TRUST SCORE67/100
PROFIT SPLIT80%TIE80%TIE
PAYOUT DAYS3d2dBETTER
MIN COST$58$29BETTER
MAX FUNDING$1,000,000$2,000,000BETTER
RATING4.73/5
REVIEW COUNT4BETTER0
STEPS2-step2-step
DRAWDOWNTrailing EODFixed

E8 MARKETS DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

E8 Markets PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $58 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry barriers.
  • +Max funding of $1,000,000 exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
  • +Days to first payout of 3 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Wide platform selection including MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, and TradeLocker suits diverse trader preferences.

E8 Markets CONS

  • Profit split of 80% falls below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing trader earnings.
  • Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing and position traders.
  • Steps to funded is 2, above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages.

FundingPips PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

FundingPips CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
  • No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

PROPDNA VERDICT

E8 Markets
Trust score 67/100. Slower payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.
FundingPips
Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

E8 Markets Full Review →FundingPips Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA
RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy