RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Earn2Trade vs FundingPips

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

E2TR

Earn2Trade

EST. 2016

FPIP

FundingPips

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022

EARN2TRADE

METRIC

FUNDINGPIPS

82/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—78/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$2,000,000

$150—

MIN COST

BETTER$29

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER2d

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

EARN2TRADE DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Sierra Chart
TYPES: futures, beginner

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

Earn2Trade PROS

+Founded in 2016, making it one of the most established firms in the industry
+Min challenge cost of $150 is below the industry average of $186.7
+News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted
+Single profit target comparison: 10% is clearly disclosed, aiding trader planning

Earn2Trade CONS

−Reported pass rate of 9% is extremely low, meaning very few traders successfully get funded
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%

FundingPips PROS

+Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

FundingPips CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
−Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
−No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Earn2Trade

Higher trust score (82/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH E2TR