RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

City Traders Imperium vs FundingPips

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

CTIM

City Traders Imperium

EST. 2018

FPIP

FundingPips

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022

CITY TRADERS IMPERIUM

METRIC

FUNDINGPIPS

78/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE78/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$4,000,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$2,000,000

$129—

MIN COST

BETTER$29

1dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—2d

25%

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

CITY TRADERS IMPERIUM DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: forex, advanced, large-cap

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

City Traders Imperium PROS

+Max funding of $4,000,000 is vastly above the industry average of $839,272.7
+Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
+Founded in 2018, making it one of the more established firms in the industry
+On-demand payouts provide immediate access to profits

City Traders Imperium CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation

FundingPips PROS

+Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

FundingPips CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
−Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
−No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

PROPDNA VERDICT

City Traders Imperium

Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

START WITH CTIM