Bulenox vs FundingPips

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BULENOX DETAILS

+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation easier to pass.
+Supports multiple platforms including NinjaTrader, Rithmic, and Tradovate.
+News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted.

−Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.

+Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
−Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
−No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

Bulenox

Lower trust score (57/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

FundingPips

Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.