RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Black Eagle Financial Group vs FundingPips
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BEFG
Black Eagle Financial Group
FPIP
FundingPips
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
BLACK EAGLE FINANCIAL GROUP
METRIC
FUNDINGPIPS
46/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER78/100
3.33/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$2,000,000
—
MIN COST
$29
—
PAYOUT DAYS
2d
—
PASS RATE
—
3BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
BLACK EAGLE FINANCIAL GROUP DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker
Black Eagle Financial Group PROS
- +A listing exists for this firm, indicating some level of industry recognition.
- +Absence of restrictive data means no confirmed below-average metrics are on record.
- +The firm's tag is registered, suggesting an intent to operate transparently on a comparison platform.
- +No negative financial metrics are currently documented for this firm.
Black Eagle Financial Group CONS
- −No data whatsoever is available for this firm, making objective evaluation impossible.
- −Traders cannot compare any metrics to industry averages due to complete absence of information.
- −Lack of founding date, country, and trading terms represents a significant transparency concern.
FundingPips PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.
FundingPips CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
- −No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy