Blueberry Futures vs FundingPips
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | Blueberry Futures EST. 2025 | FundingPips ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | — | — |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 90%BETTER | 80% |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 14d | On demandBETTER |
| MIN COST | $110 | $32BETTER |
| MAX FUNDING | $150,000BETTER | $100,000 |
| RATING | — | — |
| REVIEW COUNT | 0TIE | 0TIE |
| STEPS | 1-step | 2-step |
| DRAWDOWN | EOD|Trailing | Static/Balance-based |
BLUEBERRY FUTURES DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Blackarrow
- TYPES
- futures
FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Metals, Energies, Indices, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader
Blueberry Futures PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the average of 83.2% across listed firms.
- +Single evaluation step is below the average of 1.6 steps across listed firms.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the average of 8.1% across listed firms.
- +News trading is permitted, giving traders flexibility around market events.
Blueberry Futures CONS
- −Max funding of $150,000 is well below the average of $310,294.1 across listed firms.
- −Min challenge cost of $110 exceeds the average of $69.4 across listed firms.
- −Payout window of 14 days is longer than the average of 9.6 days across listed firms.
FundingPips PROS
- +On-demand payouts (0 days) beat the listed firms average of 9.6 days significantly.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the listed firms average of $69.40.
- +Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the listed firms average of 7.9%, giving traders more room.
- +Three platform options (MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader) offer solid multi-platform flexibility.
FundingPips CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the listed firms average of 83.2%.
- −Max funding of $100,000 is well below the listed firms average of $310,294.10.
- −Two evaluation steps required, above the listed firms average of 1.6 steps.
PROPDNA VERDICT
Blueberry Futures
Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Slower payouts (14d). 90% profit split.
FundingPips
Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts (On demand). 80% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Risk
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Commissions never affect rankings or Trust Scores, which follow our published methodology.Privacy Policy