RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blueberry Futures vs FundingPips

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BBFU

Blueberry Futures

EST. 2025

FPIP

FundingPips

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022

BLUEBERRY FUTURES

METRIC

FUNDINGPIPS

62/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER78/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—80%

$150,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$2,000,000

$184—

MIN COST

BETTER$29

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER2d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

BLUEBERRY FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Blackarrow
TYPES: futures

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

Blueberry Futures PROS

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
+Min challenge cost of $184 is just below the industry average of $186.7

Blueberry Futures CONS

−EA/automated trading is not allowed, significantly restricting algorithmic traders
−News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days

FundingPips PROS

+Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

FundingPips CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
−Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
−No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blueberry Futures

Lower trust score (62/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

START WITH BBFU