PropDNA
⌘K
Compare/Blueberry Funded vs FundingPips
HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026

Blueberry Funded vs FundingPips

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC
BBFD
Blueberry Funded
EST. 2024
FPIP
FundingPips
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
TRUST SCORE
PROFIT SPLIT80%TIE80%TIE
PAYOUT DAYS14d0dBETTER
MIN COST$40$32BETTER
MAX FUNDING$200,000BETTER$100,000
RATING
REVIEW COUNT0TIE0TIE
STEPS2-step2-step
DRAWDOWNStatic/Balance-basedStatic/Balance-based

BLUEBERRY FUNDED DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade
TYPES
Beginner Friendly, Low Cost

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Metals, Energies, Indices, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader

Blueberry Funded PROS

  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, providing maximum trading flexibility.
  • +Wide platform selection including MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, and DXtrade covers most trader preferences.
  • +Markets include stocks in addition to forex, indices, commodities, metals, and crypto, offering broad diversification.

Blueberry Funded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller share of earnings.
  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying trader income.
  • No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost after passing.

FundingPips PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

FundingPips CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
  • No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blueberry Funded
Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
FundingPips
Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Blueberry Funded Full Review →FundingPips Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA
RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy