PropDNA
Compare/Aqua Funded vs FundingPips

Aqua Funded vs FundingPips

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC
AQUA
Aqua Funded
EST. 2023
FPIP
FundingPips
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
TRUST SCORE——
PROFIT SPLIT90%BETTER80%
PAYOUT DAYS14dOn demandBETTER
MIN COST$14BETTER$32
MAX FUNDING$400,000BETTER$100,000
RATING——
REVIEW COUNT0TIE0TIE
STEPS2-step2-step
DRAWDOWNTrailingStatic/Balance-based

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Crypto, Futures, Indices, Commodities
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match Trader

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Metals, Energies, Indices, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader

Aqua Funded PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the listed firms' average of 83.2%.
  • +Max funding of $400,000 is well above the listed firms' average of $310,294.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $14 is far below the listed firms' average of $69.40.
  • +Overall drawdown allowance of 10% is higher than the listed firms' average of 7.9%.

Aqua Funded CONS

  • −Payout window of 14 days is longer than the listed firms' average of 9.6 days.
  • −Phase 1 profit target of 10% exceeds the listed firms' average of 8.1%.
  • −Two evaluation steps required is above the listed firms' average of 1.6 steps.

FundingPips PROS

  • +On-demand payouts (0 days) beat the listed firms average of 9.6 days significantly.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the listed firms average of $69.40.
  • +Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the listed firms average of 7.9%, giving traders more room.
  • +Three platform options (MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader) offer solid multi-platform flexibility.

FundingPips CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the listed firms average of 83.2%.
  • −Max funding of $100,000 is well below the listed firms average of $310,294.10.
  • −Two evaluation steps required, above the listed firms average of 1.6 steps.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Aqua Funded
Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Slower payouts (14d). 90% profit split.
FundingPips
Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts (On demand). 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Aqua Funded Full Review →FundingPips Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA
Risk

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Commissions never affect rankings or Trust Scores, which follow our published methodology.Privacy Policy