RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
ZoraFX vs Savius
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
ZRFX
ZoraFX
SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
ZORAFX
METRIC
SAVIUS
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$200,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$300,000
$59BETTER
MIN COST
—$285
10d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER3d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
ZORAFX DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT5
SAVIUS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- ATAS, Quantower
ZoraFX PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a significantly higher earnings share.
- +Min challenge cost of $59 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
- +Fee refund is offered, reducing the effective cost of the challenge upon successful completion.
- +Weekend holding and news trading are both permitted, providing strong flexibility for trading strategies.
ZoraFX CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 5% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less margin for drawdown before breach.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
- −Days to first payout at 10 is above the industry average of 6.5, meaning a longer wait for initial earnings.
Savius PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
- +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
- +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation
Savius CONS
- −Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
- −Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
- −Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy