RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ZoraFX vs Pip Traders Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ZRFX
ZoraFX
PTFD
Pip Traders Funding
ZORAFX
METRIC
PIP TRADERS FUNDING
48/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
40/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
$59
MIN COST
10d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

ZORAFX DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT5

PIP TRADERS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

ZoraFX PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a significantly higher earnings share.
  • +Min challenge cost of $59 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
  • +Fee refund is offered, reducing the effective cost of the challenge upon successful completion.
  • +Weekend holding and news trading are both permitted, providing strong flexibility for trading strategies.

ZoraFX CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 5% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less margin for drawdown before breach.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
  • Days to first payout at 10 is above the industry average of 6.5, meaning a longer wait for initial earnings.

Pip Traders Funding PROS

  • +The firm name implies a focus on forex funding, which is the most widely traded market globally.
  • +A dedicated funding model suggests a structured approach to trader evaluation and capital allocation.
  • +Pip-based performance naming may indicate a focus on measurable, transparent trading metrics.
  • +Inclusion on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public presence and accountability.

Pip Traders Funding CONS

  • No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
  • Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost data, no industry comparisons can be made.
  • Traders cannot make informed decisions without disclosure of core terms and conditions for this firm.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ZoraFX
Higher trust score (48/100). Faster payouts at 10d. 90% profit split.
Pip Traders Funding
Lower trust score (40/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

ZoraFX Full Review →Pip Traders Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy