RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ZoraFX vs Lux Trading Firm

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ZRFX

ZoraFX

LUXT

Lux Trading Firm

EST. 2019

ZORAFX

METRIC

LUX TRADING FIRM

48/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER58/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER2.8/5

90%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—75%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$10,000,000

$59BETTER

MIN COST

—$100

10d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER7d

—

PASS RATE

—

0—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER3

ZORAFX DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex
PLATFORMS: MT5

LUX TRADING FIRM DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES: forex, advanced, large-cap

ZoraFX PROS

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a significantly higher earnings share.
+Min challenge cost of $59 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
+Fee refund is offered, reducing the effective cost of the challenge upon successful completion.
+Weekend holding and news trading are both permitted, providing strong flexibility for trading strategies.

ZoraFX CONS

−Overall drawdown of 5% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less margin for drawdown before breach.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
−Days to first payout at 10 is above the industry average of 6.5, meaning a longer wait for initial earnings.

Lux Trading Firm PROS

+Max funding of $10,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering elite scaling potential.
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, providing a faster path to capital.
+Min challenge cost of $100 is below the industry average of $186.7, keeping entry costs reasonable.
+Fixed drawdown type gives traders clear and stable risk parameters to plan around.

Lux Trading Firm CONS

−Profit split of 75% is notably below the industry average of 84.7%, significantly reducing trader earnings.
−Payout frequency is monthly, which is slower than most firms offering weekly or bi-weekly payouts.
−News trading is not allowed and fee refund is unavailable, reducing trader flexibility and cost recovery options.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ZoraFX

Lower trust score (48/100). Slower payouts at 10d. 90% profit split.

START WITH ZRFX