RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ZoraFX vs Genk Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ZRFX

ZoraFX

GENK

Genk Capital

EST. 2010

ZORAFX

METRIC

GENK CAPITAL

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$200,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$59

MIN COST

—

10d

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

ZORAFX DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex
PLATFORMS: MT5

GENK CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
MARKETS: Equities, Commodities, Digital Assets

ZoraFX PROS

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a significantly higher earnings share.
+Min challenge cost of $59 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
+Fee refund is offered, reducing the effective cost of the challenge upon successful completion.
+Weekend holding and news trading are both permitted, providing strong flexibility for trading strategies.

ZoraFX CONS

−Overall drawdown of 5% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less margin for drawdown before breach.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
−Days to first payout at 10 is above the industry average of 6.5, meaning a longer wait for initial earnings.

Genk Capital PROS

+Founded in 2010, giving Genk Capital over 14 years of operational history and implied institutional experience.
+Singapore-based firm operating in one of Asia's most reputable and well-regulated financial hubs.
+Covers Equities, Commodities, and Digital Assets, offering access to diverse and distinct asset classes.
+Long-established presence may suggest greater financial stability than newer prop firms.

Genk Capital CONS

−No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is available for industry comparison.
−Absence of platform information makes it impossible to assess the trading environment.
−Traders cannot evaluate value or risk parameters without core metrics such as drawdown or profit targets.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ZoraFX

Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 10d. 90% profit split.

START WITH ZRFX