RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
ZoraFX vs FundingYourTrades.com
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
ZRFX
ZoraFX
FYTR
FundingYourTrades.com
ZORAFX
METRIC
FUNDINGYOURTRADES.COM
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$59
MIN COST
—
10d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
ZORAFX DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT5
FUNDINGYOURTRADES.COM DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
ZoraFX PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a significantly higher earnings share.
- +Min challenge cost of $59 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
- +Fee refund is offered, reducing the effective cost of the challenge upon successful completion.
- +Weekend holding and news trading are both permitted, providing strong flexibility for trading strategies.
ZoraFX CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 5% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less margin for drawdown before breach.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
- −Days to first payout at 10 is above the industry average of 6.5, meaning a longer wait for initial earnings.
FundingYourTrades.com PROS
- +A listing exists for this firm, indicating some level of industry recognition.
- +No confirmed below-average financial metrics are currently on record.
- +The firm's tag is registered, suggesting an intent to participate in transparent comparison.
- +Absence of restrictive data means no confirmed unfavorable terms are documented.
FundingYourTrades.com CONS
- −No data whatsoever is available for this firm, making objective evaluation impossible.
- −Traders cannot compare any metrics to industry averages due to complete absence of information.
- −Lack of founding date, country, and trading terms represents a significant transparency concern.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy