RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ZoraFX vs FundedNext

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ZRFX
ZoraFX
FundedNext
FNXT
FundedNext
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
ZORAFX
METRIC
FUNDEDNEXT
0/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER88/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER4.4/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER95%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$300,000
$59
MIN COST
BETTER$49
10d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER4d
PASS RATE
29%
0
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER6,750

ZORAFX DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT5

FUNDEDNEXT DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Relative
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Futures, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView
TYPES
forex, fast-payout, multi-asset, futures, crypto

ZoraFX PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a significantly higher earnings share.
  • +Min challenge cost of $59 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
  • +Fee refund is offered, reducing the effective cost of the challenge upon successful completion.
  • +Weekend holding and news trading are both permitted, providing strong flexibility for trading strategies.

ZoraFX CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 5% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less margin for drawdown before breach.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
  • Days to first payout at 10 is above the industry average of 6.5, meaning a longer wait for initial earnings.

FundedNext PROS

  • +Profit split of 95% is well above the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 4 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is offered, and weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

FundedNext CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% with a relative drawdown type is above the industry average of 7.9% and more restrictive in practice.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass.
  • Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ZoraFX
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 10d. 90% profit split.
FundedNext
Higher trust score (88/100). Faster payouts at 4d. 95% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

ZoraFX Full Review →FundedNext Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy