RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ZoraFX vs FundedFast

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ZRFX
ZoraFX
FNDF
FundedFast
ZORAFX
METRIC
FUNDEDFAST
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$59
MIN COST
BETTER$49
10d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER7d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

ZORAFX DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT5

FUNDEDFAST DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

ZoraFX PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a significantly higher earnings share.
  • +Min challenge cost of $59 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
  • +Fee refund is offered, reducing the effective cost of the challenge upon successful completion.
  • +Weekend holding and news trading are both permitted, providing strong flexibility for trading strategies.

ZoraFX CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 5% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less margin for drawdown before breach.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
  • Days to first payout at 10 is above the industry average of 6.5, meaning a longer wait for initial earnings.

FundedFast PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
  • +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
  • +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
  • +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms

FundedFast CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
  • Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve

PROPDNA VERDICT

ZoraFX
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 10d. 90% profit split.
FundedFast
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

ZoraFX Full Review →FundedFast Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy