RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ZoraFX vs Blue Guardian Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ZRFX
ZoraFX
BGFT
Blue Guardian Futures
ZORAFX
METRIC
BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER100%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$450,000
$59BETTER
MIN COST
$84
10d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER5d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

ZORAFX DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT5

BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

ZoraFX PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a significantly higher earnings share.
  • +Min challenge cost of $59 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
  • +Fee refund is offered, reducing the effective cost of the challenge upon successful completion.
  • +Weekend holding and news trading are both permitted, providing strong flexibility for trading strategies.

ZoraFX CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 5% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less margin for drawdown before breach.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
  • Days to first payout at 10 is above the industry average of 6.5, meaning a longer wait for initial earnings.

Blue Guardian Futures PROS

  • +Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Min challenge cost of $84 is well below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a streamlined path to capital
  • +Days to first payout is 5, slightly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days

Blue Guardian Futures CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 3.5% is expressed as a percentage but is exceptionally tight, increasing disqualification risk
  • Max funding of $450,000 is below the industry average of $839,272, limiting maximum earning potential
  • Futures-only market access restricts traders who prefer Forex, Indices, or other asset classes

PROPDNA VERDICT

ZoraFX
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 10d. 90% profit split.
Blue Guardian Futures
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 5d. 100% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

ZoraFX Full Review →Blue Guardian Futures Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy