RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

WarBux vs FundedFirm

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

WRBX

WarBux

FNFM

FundedFirm

WARBUX

METRIC

FUNDEDFIRM

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

100%

—

MAX FUNDING

$100,000

—

MIN COST

$549

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

WARBUX DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

FUNDEDFIRM DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex
PLATFORMS: MT5

WarBux PROS

+Listed on PropDNA, providing traders a point of reference
+No confirmed below-average metrics due to absence of data
+Firm identity is established enough to be catalogued for comparison
+No restrictive trading conditions are confirmed from available data

WarBux CONS

−No data provided on profit split, max funding, or challenge cost
−No trading conditions such as drawdown, profit target, or payout terms are available
−Traders cannot meaningfully compare this firm to industry averages without data

FundedFirm PROS

+100% profit split is exceptionally above the industry average of 84.7%
+Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Single-step evaluation is below the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded
+Fee refund is available, reducing the net cost of the evaluation

FundedFirm CONS

−Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
−Min challenge cost of $549 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass

PROPDNA VERDICT

WarBux

Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH WRBX