RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

WeGetFunded vs Genk Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

WGFD

WeGetFunded

GENK

Genk Capital

EST. 2010

WEGETFUNDED

METRIC

GENK CAPITAL

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$200,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$199

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

WEGETFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
MARKETS: Forex, Crypto, Commodities, Indices
PLATFORMS: cTrader, MT5

GENK CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
MARKETS: Equities, Commodities, Digital Assets

WeGetFunded PROS

+Overall drawdown of 4% is significantly lower than the industry average of 7.9%, limiting downside risk.
+Offers two well-regarded platforms, cTrader and MT5, giving traders flexible execution options.
+Covers four asset classes including Forex, Crypto, Commodities, and Indices for diversified trading.
+Min challenge cost of $199 is close to the industry average of $186.7, making entry reasonably accessible.

WeGetFunded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their gains.
−Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Two steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more hoops to reach a live account.

Genk Capital PROS

+Founded in 2010, giving Genk Capital over 14 years of operational history and implied institutional experience.
+Singapore-based firm operating in one of Asia's most reputable and well-regulated financial hubs.
+Covers Equities, Commodities, and Digital Assets, offering access to diverse and distinct asset classes.
+Long-established presence may suggest greater financial stability than newer prop firms.

Genk Capital CONS

−No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is available for industry comparison.
−Absence of platform information makes it impossible to assess the trading environment.
−Traders cannot evaluate value or risk parameters without core metrics such as drawdown or profit targets.

PROPDNA VERDICT

WeGetFunded

Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at —d. 80% profit split.

START WITH WGFD