RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

WeGetFunded vs Funded Futures Network

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

WGFD

WeGetFunded

FFNT

Funded Futures Network

EST. 2022

WEGETFUNDED

METRIC

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK

47/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER59/100

3.42/5—

RATING

BETTER4/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$250,000

$199—

MIN COST

BETTER$81

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

5BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—1

WEGETFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
MARKETS: Forex, Crypto, Commodities, Indices
PLATFORMS: cTrader, MT5

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower

WeGetFunded PROS

+Overall drawdown of 4% is significantly lower than the industry average of 7.9%, limiting downside risk.
+Offers two well-regarded platforms, cTrader and MT5, giving traders flexible execution options.
+Covers four asset classes including Forex, Crypto, Commodities, and Indices for diversified trading.
+Min challenge cost of $199 is close to the industry average of $186.7, making entry reasonably accessible.

WeGetFunded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their gains.
−Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Two steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more hoops to reach a live account.

Funded Futures Network PROS

+Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
+Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
−Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
−Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

PROPDNA VERDICT

WeGetFunded

Lower trust score (47/100). Slower payouts at —d. 80% profit split.

START WITH WGFD