RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
WeGetFunded vs Funderpro
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
WGFD
WeGetFunded
FDRP
Funderpro
EST. 2023
WEGETFUNDED
METRIC
FUNDERPRO
47/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER65/100
3.42/5—
RATING
BETTER4.78/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$200,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$200,000
$199—
MIN COST
BETTER$79
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
—
5BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—3
WEGETFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- MARKETS
- Forex, Crypto, Commodities, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- cTrader, MT5
FUNDERPRO DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader
WeGetFunded PROS
- +Overall drawdown of 4% is significantly lower than the industry average of 7.9%, limiting downside risk.
- +Offers two well-regarded platforms, cTrader and MT5, giving traders flexible execution options.
- +Covers four asset classes including Forex, Crypto, Commodities, and Indices for diversified trading.
- +Min challenge cost of $199 is close to the industry average of $186.7, making entry reasonably accessible.
WeGetFunded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their gains.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Two steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more hoops to reach a live account.
Funderpro PROS
- +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Min challenge cost of $79 is well below the industry average of $186.7
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
- +Four platforms supported (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader) offering broad trader choice
Funderpro CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing traders
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy