RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
WeGetFunded vs Crypto Fund Trader
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
WGFD
WeGetFunded
CRFT
Crypto Fund Trader
EST. 2022
WEGETFUNDED
METRIC
CRYPTO FUND TRADER
47/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
3.42/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$200,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$200,000
$199BETTER
MIN COST
—$5,000
—
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
5BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
WEGETFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- MARKETS
- Forex, Crypto, Commodities, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- cTrader, MT5
CRYPTO FUND TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
- MARKETS
- Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5
WeGetFunded PROS
- +Overall drawdown of 4% is significantly lower than the industry average of 7.9%, limiting downside risk.
- +Offers two well-regarded platforms, cTrader and MT5, giving traders flexible execution options.
- +Covers four asset classes including Forex, Crypto, Commodities, and Indices for diversified trading.
- +Min challenge cost of $199 is close to the industry average of $186.7, making entry reasonably accessible.
WeGetFunded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their gains.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Two steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more hoops to reach a live account.
Crypto Fund Trader PROS
- +Crypto-focused offering provides niche market access unavailable at most prop firms
- +Based in Switzerland, a well-regulated and reputable financial hub
- +Founded in 2022, indicating an established operational track record
- +Offers MT5, a widely used and trusted trading platform
Crypto Fund Trader CONS
- −Min challenge cost of $5,000 is vastly higher than the industry average of $186.7
- −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
- −No profit split, drawdown, or profit target data provided, limiting informed comparison
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy