RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

WeGetFunded vs Blue Guardian Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

WGFD

WeGetFunded

BGFT

Blue Guardian Futures

WEGETFUNDED

METRIC

BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES

47/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER61/100

3.42/5—

RATING

BETTER4.29/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER100%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$450,000

$199—

MIN COST

BETTER$84

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

5BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—3

WEGETFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
MARKETS: Forex, Crypto, Commodities, Indices
PLATFORMS: cTrader, MT5

BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

WeGetFunded PROS

+Overall drawdown of 4% is significantly lower than the industry average of 7.9%, limiting downside risk.
+Offers two well-regarded platforms, cTrader and MT5, giving traders flexible execution options.
+Covers four asset classes including Forex, Crypto, Commodities, and Indices for diversified trading.
+Min challenge cost of $199 is close to the industry average of $186.7, making entry reasonably accessible.

WeGetFunded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their gains.
−Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Two steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more hoops to reach a live account.

Blue Guardian Futures PROS

+Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
+Min challenge cost of $84 is well below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a streamlined path to capital
+Days to first payout is 5, slightly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days

Blue Guardian Futures CONS

−Overall drawdown of 3.5% is expressed as a percentage but is exceptionally tight, increasing disqualification risk
−Max funding of $450,000 is below the industry average of $839,272, limiting maximum earning potential
−Futures-only market access restricts traders who prefer Forex, Indices, or other asset classes

PROPDNA VERDICT

WeGetFunded

Lower trust score (47/100). Slower payouts at —d. 80% profit split.

START WITH WGFD