RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
WeGetFunded vs Aqua Funded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
WGFD
WeGetFunded
AQUA
Aqua Funded
EST. 2023
WEGETFUNDED
METRIC
AQUA FUNDED
47/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER59/100
3.42/5—
RATING
BETTER4/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$200,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$199—
MIN COST
BETTER$1
—
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
—
PASS RATE
—
5BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—2
WEGETFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- MARKETS
- Forex, Crypto, Commodities, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- cTrader, MT5
AQUA FUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker
WeGetFunded PROS
- +Overall drawdown of 4% is significantly lower than the industry average of 7.9%, limiting downside risk.
- +Offers two well-regarded platforms, cTrader and MT5, giving traders flexible execution options.
- +Covers four asset classes including Forex, Crypto, Commodities, and Indices for diversified trading.
- +Min challenge cost of $199 is close to the industry average of $186.7, making entry reasonably accessible.
WeGetFunded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their gains.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Two steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more hoops to reach a live account.
Aqua Funded PROS
- +Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.
Aqua Funded CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
- −Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
- −Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy