RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

WeGetFunded vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

WGFD
WeGetFunded
Aqua Funded
AQUA
Aqua Funded
EST. 2023
WEGETFUNDED
METRIC
AQUA FUNDED
47/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER59/100
3.42/5
RATING
BETTER4/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$199
MIN COST
BETTER$1
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
PASS RATE
5BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
2

WEGETFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
MARKETS
Forex, Crypto, Commodities, Indices
PLATFORMS
cTrader, MT5

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

WeGetFunded PROS

  • +Overall drawdown of 4% is significantly lower than the industry average of 7.9%, limiting downside risk.
  • +Offers two well-regarded platforms, cTrader and MT5, giving traders flexible execution options.
  • +Covers four asset classes including Forex, Crypto, Commodities, and Indices for diversified trading.
  • +Min challenge cost of $199 is close to the industry average of $186.7, making entry reasonably accessible.

WeGetFunded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their gains.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Two steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more hoops to reach a live account.

Aqua Funded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
  • Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
  • Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

WeGetFunded
Lower trust score (47/100). Slower payouts at —d. 80% profit split.
Aqua Funded
Higher trust score (59/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

WeGetFunded Full Review →Aqua Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy