RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

WeGetFunded vs AquaFutures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

WGFD
WeGetFunded
AQFT
AquaFutures
WEGETFUNDED
METRIC
AQUAFUTURES
47/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
43/100
3.42/5
RATING
BETTER4/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
$199
MIN COST
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
5BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
1

WEGETFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
MARKETS
Forex, Crypto, Commodities, Indices
PLATFORMS
cTrader, MT5

AQUAFUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

WeGetFunded PROS

  • +Overall drawdown of 4% is significantly lower than the industry average of 7.9%, limiting downside risk.
  • +Offers two well-regarded platforms, cTrader and MT5, giving traders flexible execution options.
  • +Covers four asset classes including Forex, Crypto, Commodities, and Indices for diversified trading.
  • +Min challenge cost of $199 is close to the industry average of $186.7, making entry reasonably accessible.

WeGetFunded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their gains.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Two steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more hoops to reach a live account.

AquaFutures PROS

  • +Listed as a futures firm, which offers an asset class not available at all prop firms.
  • +Firm name suggests an association with the Aqua brand, which may indicate shared infrastructure or credibility.
  • +Futures trading can provide access to high-liquidity instruments with defined contract specifications.
  • +The futures category is a growing segment within prop trading, reflecting market demand.

AquaFutures CONS

  • No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective assessment impossible.
  • Without metrics such as profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no comparisons can be made.
  • Traders should seek full disclosure of terms before considering this firm, as critical information is absent.

PROPDNA VERDICT

WeGetFunded
Higher trust score (47/100). Faster payouts at —d. 80% profit split.
AquaFutures
Lower trust score (43/100). Faster payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

WeGetFunded Full Review →AquaFutures Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy