RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

WEBB Traders vs QT Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

WBBT
WEBB Traders
EST. 2009
QT Funded
QT
QT Funded
EST. 2023
WEBB TRADERS
METRIC
QT FUNDED
0/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER72/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
MIN COST
$12
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

WEBB TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

WEBB Traders PROS

  • +Founded in 2009, suggesting over 15 years of operational history and stability
  • +No data is available on profit split to compare against the 84.7% industry average
  • +No data is available on max funding to compare against the $839,272.7 industry average
  • +No data is available on challenge cost to compare against the $186.7 industry average

WEBB Traders CONS

  • Virtually no financial or trading metrics are provided beyond founding date and country
  • Traders cannot assess payout speed relative to the industry average of 6.5 days
  • Absence of drawdown, profit target, and steps data prevents any meaningful comparison

QT Funded PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

PROPDNA VERDICT

WEBB Traders
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
QT Funded
Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

WEBB Traders Full Review →QT Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy