RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

WEBB Traders vs FTMO

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

WBBT
WEBB Traders
EST. 2009
FTMO
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
WEBB TRADERS
METRIC
FTMO
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER61/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER4/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
—
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
—
MIN COST
$155
—
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
—
PASS RATE
22%
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1

WEBB TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FTMO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

WEBB Traders PROS

  • +Founded in 2009, suggesting over 15 years of operational history and stability
  • +No data is available on profit split to compare against the 84.7% industry average
  • +No data is available on max funding to compare against the $839,272.7 industry average
  • +No data is available on challenge cost to compare against the $186.7 industry average

WEBB Traders CONS

  • −Virtually no financial or trading metrics are provided beyond founding date and country
  • −Traders cannot assess payout speed relative to the industry average of 6.5 days
  • −Absence of drawdown, profit target, and steps data prevents any meaningful comparison

FTMO PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
  • +Fee refund is available
  • +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
  • +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
  • +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.

FTMO CONS

  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
  • −News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.

PROPDNA VERDICT

WEBB Traders
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
FTMO
Higher trust score (61/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

WEBB Traders Full Review →FTMO Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy