RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

WEBB Traders vs ATFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

WBBT
WEBB Traders
EST. 2009
ATFD
ATFunded
WEBB TRADERS
METRIC
ATFUNDED
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
MIN COST
$49
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

WEBB TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

WEBB Traders PROS

  • +Founded in 2009, suggesting over 15 years of operational history and stability
  • +No data is available on profit split to compare against the 84.7% industry average
  • +No data is available on max funding to compare against the $839,272.7 industry average
  • +No data is available on challenge cost to compare against the $186.7 industry average

WEBB Traders CONS

  • Virtually no financial or trading metrics are provided beyond founding date and country
  • Traders cannot assess payout speed relative to the industry average of 6.5 days
  • Absence of drawdown, profit target, and steps data prevents any meaningful comparison

ATFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
  • +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
  • +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
  • +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

PROPDNA VERDICT

WEBB Traders
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
ATFunded
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

WEBB Traders Full Review →ATFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy