RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
WEBB Traders vs ATFunded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
WBBT
WEBB Traders
EST. 2009
ATFD
ATFunded
WEBB TRADERS
METRIC
ATFUNDED
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
—
MIN COST
$49
—
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
WEBB TRADERS DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
ATFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
WEBB Traders PROS
- +Founded in 2009, suggesting over 15 years of operational history and stability
- +No data is available on profit split to compare against the 84.7% industry average
- +No data is available on max funding to compare against the $839,272.7 industry average
- +No data is available on challenge cost to compare against the $186.7 industry average
WEBB Traders CONS
- −Virtually no financial or trading metrics are provided beyond founding date and country
- −Traders cannot assess payout speed relative to the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Absence of drawdown, profit target, and steps data prevents any meaningful comparison
ATFunded PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
- +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
- +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
- +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.
ATFunded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy