RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

V Prop Trader vs FundedFast

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

VPRT

V Prop Trader

FNDF

FundedFast

V PROP TRADER

METRIC

FUNDEDFAST

57/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—56/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER2.57/5

95%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—80%

—

MAX FUNDING

$400,000

—

MIN COST

$49

0dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—7d

—

PASS RATE

—

0—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER2

V PROP TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
MARKETS: Forex, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, VTrader

FUNDEDFAST DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex

V Prop Trader PROS

+Profit split of 95% is significantly above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
+Days to first payout of 0 means traders can access profits immediately, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Offers MT5 alongside the proprietary VTrader platform, providing at least one widely recognised trading environment.
+Covers both Forex and Crypto markets, giving traders access to high-liquidity and high-volatility asset classes.

V Prop Trader CONS

−No max funding, challenge cost, or drawdown data is provided for comparison against industry averages.
−Two steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring additional evaluation stages.
−Limited market coverage of only two asset classes may restrict diversification compared to broader offerings.

FundedFast PROS

+Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
+Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
+Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
+Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms

FundedFast CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
−Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve

PROPDNA VERDICT

V Prop Trader

Higher trust score (57/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 95% profit split.

START WITH VPRT