RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

UProfit vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

UPFT
UProfit
Aqua Funded
AQUA
Aqua Funded
EST. 2023
UPROFIT
METRIC
AQUA FUNDED
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER54/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
—
MAX FUNDING
$2,000,000
—
MIN COST
$1
—
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

UPROFIT DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

UProfit PROS

  • +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for this firm
  • +No fee, payout, or structure data provided to evaluate competitiveness
  • +No platform or market information is available to assess trading flexibility
  • +Country of operation (United States) is noted, but no structural data exists

UProfit CONS

  • −No data is provided for this firm, making any meaningful comparison impossible
  • −Traders cannot assess profit split, funding, or costs against industry averages
  • −Complete absence of data is a significant transparency concern for traders making financial decisions

Aqua Funded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

  • −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
  • −Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
  • −Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

UProfit
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Aqua Funded
Higher trust score (54/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

UProfit Full Review →Aqua Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy