RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Upcomers vs Get Funded Now
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
UPCM
Upcomers
EST. 2023
GFND
Get Funded Now
UPCOMERS
METRIC
GET FUNDED NOW
48/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER57/100
5/5BETTER
RATING
—2/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
—
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
—
MIN COST
$123
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
—
2BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—1
UPCOMERS DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
GET FUNDED NOW DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities
Upcomers PROS
- +Czech Republic is an EU-member jurisdiction, which may offer relevant regulatory context for European traders.
- +No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
- +No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
- +No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.
Upcomers CONS
- −Founded in 2023, making Upcomers a very new firm with minimal operational track record.
- −No profit split, drawdown, funding, or challenge cost data is available for industry comparison.
- −Lack of transparency around key metrics makes it very difficult for traders to make informed decisions.
Get Funded Now PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Single-step evaluation is below the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded
- +On-demand payouts provide maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
Get Funded Now CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering less buffer
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass
- −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy